Dodgy isn't it Dawny? I notice in the publishers menu & settings on here there's a section mentioning Blue Sky. It seems theyre trying to get publishers to link to it 🤔
As I've just said to lovely Depswah down there 👇...
Let's all donate towards the cost of our own virtual shackles! ..... I think not!
If, this is of the utmost importance - Actors with resources, large - They can fund this on their own!
Exactly! 👍
Let's all donate towards the cost of our own virtual shackles! ..... I think not!
MUWAH!
I didn't copy, I swear. Lol.
Blessings,
Janey
If the Wikipedia guy is involved, we know it isn't going to be about 'free speech'.
And as for your question: "Surely they could fund it themselves?" I'd say: Yes, of course.
Dodgy isn't it Dawny? I notice in the publishers menu & settings on here there's a section mentioning Blue Sky. It seems theyre trying to get publishers to link to it 🤔
As I've just said to lovely Depswah down there 👇...
Let's all donate towards the cost of our own virtual shackles! ..... I think not!
Hi Tina,
Lol, they literally want us to fund our oppression? "Free our feeds" is definitely newspeak.
Blessings,
Janey